Writing Intensive Resources
Humanities
English Literature
These resources were adapted from an upper level English class. They provide projects, assignments, and resources related to each of the five criteria and two student learning outcomes required for a writing-intensive class. They also provide opportunities for investigation into social justice issues and engagement with community partners.
By adapting the project ideas below into your course content, your class will meet the requirements for a writing-intensive class. It is recommended that you meet with the Director of Writing Across the Curriculum to discuss the adaptations before submitting a formal request to the Core to have your class designated writing intensive.
Informal Writing
These assignment ideas contribute to course criteria 3 and 4.
Reflection: The purpose of reflection assignments is to help students think about and connect personally with readings to explore the themes and ideas present in the literature.
Integration between Course Criteria, SLOs 3 and 4, and Projects/ Assignments
-
Criteria: Students will be able to write effectively for specific purposes and audiences.
Purpose: The purpose of student writing in this class is to help students achieve the course learning outcomes while also helping them learn about and reflect on the themes and subject matter found in the literature read throughout the semester.
Informal Writing: All informal writing helps students begin the invention process for the formal writing assignments. Students discuss informal writing with classmates through group work and presentations. The informal writing takes students through the writing to learn and writing to engage stages.
Formal Writing: All formal writing helps students describe and analyze the ways in which genre conventions and motifs work within texts and produce analyses of the ways in which literary forms and structures inform meaning and purpose. The formal compositions move students to the writing in the disciplines stage, and by the end of the term, students should be writing at the Achieve level.
Audience: The audience for all assignments is the students’ peers and their instructor. If students choose to submit their work for publication, their audience is the reviewers and readers of SLU literary journals or undergraduate journals published outside of the university, such as the Sigma Tau Delta Review.
-
For the Canvas reading responses and all three formal writing assignments, students analyze and synthesize claims from articles we read for the course (lay audience and peer-reviewed), the fiction we read/watch for the course, and work they find during their research.
-
For the Canvas reading responses and all three formal writing assignments, students analyze, synthesize, and integrate information from articles we read for the course (lay audience and peer-reviewed), the fiction we read/watch for the course, and work they find during their research.
-
The process of brainstorming, researching, drafting, and submitting that students follow provides them with many opportunities to engage in the process of invention and revision and enables them to evaluate their own and others’ rhetorical choices in written messages and arguments. All informal writing in the course helps students synthesize, analyze, and reflect on the works we read and the discussions we have in class. For the formal writing assignments, students may extend their thoughts from the informal assignments, or they may choose new topics to analyze. Invention activities include in-class writing (free writing, short answer, etc.), idea maps, and groupwork.
-
I teach ethics and using ethical communication in two ways: First, through an ethics chapter and ethical dilemma case study based on the genre pieces we’re reading; and second, through accurate presentation and attribution of sources.
-
Beginning with in-class discussions and writing activities, as well as the reader responses on Canvas, students assess and draw reasoned conclusions based on outside sources and based on the texts we read for the course. The in-class discussion questions and in-class writing prompts, as well as the reader response prompts, ask students to analyze and evaluate the peer-reviewed and lay audience publications that discuss literature and its themes. In addition, all the formal writing assignments ask students to assess evidence and draw reasoned conclusions. Major questions that students answer through informal and formal writing include the following:
What is the specific genre?
What is this genre’s themes and elements, and how do they work?
Where did this genre come from (which genres preceded and currently influence it?)
How do genre authors/film makers use their writing/filming strategies and genre themes to reinforce and/or challenge the genre?
How do genre authors’ literary forms and strategies inform the meaning and purpose of their work?
Students use secondary sources, the literary texts themselves, and their sound reasoning to form arguments to answer these questions.
-
Through informal writing and through drafting, revising, and finalizing formal assignments, students move through Palmquist’s writing to learn, writing to engage, and writing in the discipline stages to arrive at the Achieve level in their capstone paper at the end of the term. Students also present on their responses to reading throughout the term using PPT slides that follow best practices in visual rhetoric. Based on writing pedagogy best practices, and reinforced through the WI grading rubric, students practice higher order concerns (HOCs), such as responded to specific purposes and audiences, as well as overall organization and the organization of sections and chapters. Students also practice lower (or later) order concerns (LOCs), such as tone, sentence structure, word choice, active voice, and genre conventions (grammar and punctuation). By the time students are working on their final paper, they should be writing at the Achieve level; that is, they should be working at the writing in the discipline level where they could, if they chose, submit their capstone to a SLU literary journal or an undergraduate literary journal published outside the university.
Short-Answer: The purpose of short-answer assignments is to help student begin the process of writing to learn more about the specific genre as well as the process of literary analysis.
Recommendation:
2-3 per semester, 500 words
Canvas Reading Response: The purpose of reading response assignments is to help students begin the process of writing to engage critically with the subject matter. Each response should be about 500 words.
Recommendation:
2-3 per semester, 500 words
Recommendation:
4 per semester, 500 words
Formal Writing
These assignment ideas contribute to course criteria 1 and 2.
Project 1 - Intro to Analyzing Literary Genre
-
The purpose of the first paper assignment is to help students describe and analyze the writing strategies and/or themes that authors use to reinforce and/or challenge the genre expectations of the literary genre being discussed.
-
2,000-2,500 words
Due around week 5 of the semester
Project 2 - The Film Analysis
-
The purpose of the second paper assignment is to help students describe and analyze the movie making strategies and/or themes that writers and filmmakers use to reinforce and/or challenge the genre expectations of the literary genre being analyzed.
-
750-1,000 words
Due around week 9 of the semester
Project 3 - Capstone to Analyzing Literary Genre
-
The purpose of the third paper is to help students analyze the literary forms and strategies that authors use to inform the meaning and purpose of their work.
-
2,000-2,500 words
Due final week of the semester with possible first draft due to workshop in class on week 10
Ethical Public Discourse
These assignment ideas contribute to course criteria 5.
Because ethics and ethical dilemmas play such an important role in literature, it is recommended to integrate a good deal of time and discussion to this topic. One way to introduce this is by using the chapter on Ethics from Technical Communication Today (2017) by Richard Johnson-Sheehan. Ideally, you would want to set aside two class periods to engage directly with this topic.
John Dewey’s moral philosophy may be helpful in framing this work, specifically his ideas in developmental and social psychology: Impulse (childhood behavior); Habit (forming adult-like behavior through purposeful activities); and, Intelligent Conduct (the “usual operation of habit whereby impulse is blocked”) (2005).
Ethics Project 1 - Character Ethics
-
Use an example from one of the literary works read. Ask the students to personally decide how they would work through one of the ethical dilemmas faced by one of the characters in one of the readings.
The goal is that students learn from the ethical dilemmas that characters from the readings face to help students improve their decision-making skills.
-
Students identify the ethical system(s) in which the dilemma resides:
personal ethics
social ethics, and/or
conservation ethics.
-
If the dilemma resides within or overlaps with social ethics, students next identify the ethical situation(s) based on Manuel Velasquez’s (2002) categories: rights, justice, utility, and care.
-
Students move through a list of questions that will help them decide how they would handle the ethical dilemma from the reading:
Do any laws or rules govern my decision?
Do any corporate or professional codes of ethics offer guidance?
Are there any historical records to learn from?
What do my friends and/or colleagues think?
What would moral leaders do?
-
Step 4: Students decide what they will do and explain why they would make the choice to take the same or a difference path of action than the characters in the story. The choice is tailored to the textual situation, but some general categories they can choose from include the following:
Persuade through costs and benefits
Seek legal advice
Seek mediation
Write a memo to file
Become a whistleblower
Ethics Project 2 - The Ethics of Authorship
-
Students should read “Literary Hoaxes and the Ethics of Authorship” by Louis Menand.
They should also read “Ghostwriter and Ghost: The Strange Case of Pearl Curran & Patience Worth.”
Ask them to pick one of the examples given by Menand or the case of Pearl Curran to discuss the ethical implications inherent in the choices made by these authors.
-
Students identify the ethical system(s) in which the dilemma resides:
personal ethics
social ethics, and/or
conservation ethics.
-
If the dilemma resides within or overlaps with social ethics, students next identify the ethical situation(s) based on Manuel Velasquez’s (2002) categories: rights, justice, utility, and care.
-
Students move through a list of questions that will help them decide how they would handle the ethical dilemma from the reading:
Do any laws or rules govern my decision?
Do any corporate or professional codes of ethics offer guidance?
Are there any historical records to learn from?
What do my friends and/or colleagues think?
What would moral leaders do?
-
Step 4: Students decide what they will do and explain why they would make the choice to take the same or a difference path of action than the author. The choice is tailored to the textual situation, but some general categories they can choose from include the following:
Persuade through costs and benefits
Seek legal advice
Seek mediation
Write a memo to file
Become a whistleblower
Social Justice
For ways to highlight diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice as well as to connect your class to the local community, consider some of the following suggestions:
-
As your students are working on their own writing, this may be an excellent opportunity to provide them with the ability to tutor local elementary school students in writing. SLU has many partnerships with local schools. For more information, please visit: https://www.slu.edu/center-for-social-action/service-learning/integrating-service-curriculum.php
-
Use the informal writing exercises as ways to ask students to reflect on DEIJ issues within the literature being studied. Some question for them to respond to could be:
What is the role of women in the story? How are they approached/ treated?
How do traditionally underrepresented populations appear in the story?
Who is the hero/ protagonist in the story and how do they reinforce or work against traditional roles and stereotypes?
-
What local artists can you engage to be part of the class discussions and readings?
-
Engage the class in a discussion around the genre and its contribution to ethical public discourse.
-
If any of your students wish to write any of their reports on a local author, this work can be published on The Saint Louis Story under the community section. Please email allen.brizee@slu.edu to have the work considered for inclusion.